Several Chilean parliamentarians believed today that the recognition of Peru to the nautical chart Ecuador submitted to the UN represents an "own goal" for the country and a "triumph" for Chile, and also makes its maritime claim is "ridiculous and absurd."
Meanwhile, the president, Sebastián Piñera, participated on Tuesday in a public activity, but made no statement on the matter.
Still, the government is expected to rule today on the decision of Peru, as announced yesterday by the spokesman, Ena Von Baer.
The demand that this country had in 2008 before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague for customizing your favor the maritime boundary with its neighbor to the south is based on these borders are not established.
Chile rejects this argument on the basis of two agreements signed in the 50's by the two countries and Ecuador, which has since had demarcated the maritime boundary, and that in its application Peru believes they are just fishing agreements.
"By accepting the chart of making Ecuador (Peru) is the recognition that the treaties of 1952 and 1954 are not fishing agreements, but treaties that set limits, which contradicts everything that Peru has" reflected the government senator Hernán Larraín.
"That own goal shows that Chile has always been right and therefore the situation in Peru today is a ridiculous situation, absurd, grotesque, which has nothing more than falling in a court of law such as the International Court in The Hague ( CIJ), clinched.
Meanwhile, for President of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Senate, the opposition Eugenio Tuma, this recognition "unfeasible" to the tribunal in The Hague to promote the aspirations of Peru.
"This is a great triumph of democracy and the Chilean diplomacy," noted Tuma, who argued that, when to draw the maritime borders of Peru, "what is good for Ecuador in the north, it's good for Chile the south. "
In turn, opposition Senator Jorge Pizarro said that Peru had to recognize the treaty with Ecuador to avoid "a major conflict, and in so doing, what it does is ratify the Chilean position that treaties are adjacent and no fisheries agreements" .
"What drives these maritime boundaries to define the parallel and bisecting not they have been raised in a rather fanciful," said Pizarro, also a member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Senate.
Escribe un comentario
Los comentarios están cerrados